That’s the first thought that enters my mind when I hear people say they’re voting for Barack Hussein Obama AKA Barry Soetoro. It frankly just astounds me.
“Barry”, to say the least, is dishonest.
His blatant errors in judgement (those he’s worked with, been “friendly” with or gave money to i.e ACORN, Bill Ayers, Antoin “Tony” Rezko) and his ever changing version of “facts” about himself and his political policies should raise a few if not many red flags.
He chose to hang with, be on committees with and blurp a book with a Unrepentant domestic TERRORIST, William “Bill” Ayers. (Bill Ayers contributed $200 to Obama’s re-election fund to the Illinois State Senate in April 2001, also).
When questioned about Ayers, “Barry” (or his surrogates) almost always reply with the tired old line of “only being 8 years old..” and that domestic terrorism that Ayers did was “many years ago”. Then he changed his story again to say he “though Ayers had been rehabilitated”. His story(s) and his connection to Ayers has changed and varied so much over time it’s hard to know what version he and his campaign are currently using in their sound bites.
The guts of the Ayers issue are those regarding “Barry’s” judgement. That he would associate with a known unrepentant domestic terrorist is not something to be taken lightly or someone that should hold the office of President. His willingness to accept a terrorist into his life shows bad judgement. Sure “Barry” says Ayers acts were “dispicable”, but why continue to be around that individual or accept money from them if you feel that way?
It doesn’t make sense.
Then ya got Tony Rezko, a slumlord sleazeball that “Barry” has described as a “friend”. Rezko was convicted on several counts of fraud and bribery in 2008. Rezko also helped get “Barry” a great deal on real estate, as well as donating money to “Barry’s” campaign. Doesn’t Mr. Rezko sound like a person ya want as a “friend” of the President?? I think not.
You’d think that would be enough “associations” with sleaze and impropriety for one person. But not “Barry”.
He’s got connections with ACORN too.
I’m sure you’ve heard of ACORN by now even if you watch CNN,NBC or MSNBC as your only “news” source.
ACORN is connected with Voter Registration Fraud and recently a few cases of bona fide Voter Fraud, across the United States.
They’ve years of corrupt voting and registration activity which they try to pass off onto a few ‘bad apples’ out getting registrations for cash. That might be believable if it happened a few times only. But it hasn’t. It’s happened for years.
To be repeately soiled by ‘a few bad apples’ leads the logical mind to believe that ACORN itself is at the core (pardon the pun) of these ‘few bad apples’. As a matter of fact, there have been convictions of ACORN personel in a few states. The FBI is currently investigating their activity and a few ACORN offices (those that didn’t suddenly have a theft of computers in them, that is) around the country,” coincidentally” in swing states. It has to make a person wonder if there’s any sort of connection between the fraud and that it’s cropping up in a lot of swing states.
If you ask most Liberal Democrats, there’s no connection. Even though most of the questionable registrations are pro-democrat. They even claim ACORN is the “victim” in all this and that Republicans are ‘just trying to surpress votes’ by questioning the activity surrounding ACORN.
Is it also a coincidence that “Barry” and his campaign paid $832000 to an Acorn affiliate. They initially told the Federal Election Commission that money was for “staging, sound, lighting.” Then later admitted the cash was to get out the vote. Money + questionable resgistrations + swing states = high poll numbers and damn high probablility that will equate to more votes for “Barry”.
Isn’t “Barry” looking more Presidential already?
There’s also a little reported court case involving “Barry”, the DNC and the Federal Elections Commission in Pennsylvania. It was filed by a Democrat.
BERG v. OBAMA et al
Plaintiff Philip J. Berg alleged that Defendant Barack Obama is not eligible for the Office of the President because Obama lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother married an Indonesian citizen and naturalized in Indonesia. Plaintiff further alleged that Obama followed her naturalization and failed to take an oath of allegiance when he turned 18 years old to regain his U.S. citizenship status.
Case Number: 2:2008cv04083
Filed: August 21, 2008
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office [ Court Info ]
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK
It’s a case you won’t hear of on the nightly news programs. It just would not do to ’sully’ their coverage of their candidate to report information not flattering to “Barry”.
Add to all those, with his lie about taking public funding for his campaign (a pledge he signed, btw) and his remark(s) such as “they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” I thought Joe Biden was the one who made the ‘gaffes’?
The people of this country were outraged by Nixon’s activities, it would seem they should be outraged by “Barry’s”. It would also be logical that after the press and a few polititians made a big issue of both Bill Clintons drug use-though he says he didn’t inhale, and George W. Bush’s drinking and drug use, they’d think twice before voting for “Barry” after his admitted drug use.
“Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance,” “Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though.” he wrote in his 1996 memoir.
But it gets little attention. Is it now ok to drink and do drugs and run the country? Or is it only ok if you’re running under the liberal Democrat banner?? Does honesty and a judgement not matter anymore as long as you tow your party line and it’s your party that’s ahead?
Why does it take millions of dollars to run for the office of President for some while public money is good enough for others? Is that how one buys an election?
Is there now only one type of true feminist and/or real woman- Those who are militant about retaining their “right to choose”, who don’t care if you use abortion as a means of birth control just as long as you can have it done.
While, those traditional woman, woman that love being mothers, have a career or not and don’t believe in abortion or in the edict that all men are evil, are now looked down upon by mainstream media outlets as well as by extreme left leaning zealots like that whoopi person even though these woman are happy with their own choices, and a large part of the progress women have made in today’s world. If you doubt me, look at the smears and lies about Gov. Sarah Palin.
The past two years of this Presidential campaign have highlighted the greedy, the sleazy and the bias. They’ve shown the country and the world just how much a nation can be marred when those who are overly ambitious lust for power at any price.
The price will be heavy if you cast your vote for Barrack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro.
Not just to the moral fabric of our country but from the taxes that will weigh down the average joe, kill small busnisses and jobs and throw money at those who don’t pay into the system. All the while the deficit is growing larger to extend the debt to generations beyond your children.
You can already feel the country tilt to the left even while you read.
Feel free to comment, but don’t whine if my bluntness hurts your feelings.
